Nb. Isada et al., FLUORESCENT IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION AND 2ND-TRIMESTER SONOGRAPHIC ANOMALIES - USES AND LIMITATIONS, Fetal diagnosis and therapy, 9(6), 1994, pp. 367-370
The critical need for rapid and reliable karyotype analysis can be no
greater than in the setting of sonographic fetal anomalies. Fluorescen
t in situ hybridization (FISH) directly applied to interphase chromoso
mes can decrease the time required to identify the common aneuploidies
. Our retrospective study reviewed 50 consecutive patients with sonogr
aphic fetal anomalies who underwent FISH. Within this high risk group,
nonmosaic chromosomal aneuploidies were present in 16% of the fetuses
(8 of 50), and 2 additional fetuses had cytogenetic abnormalities: 1
case, 46,XY,-12,+der(12)t(12;13)(p13; q14.1), and 1 case a 10% mosaic
for trisomy 21. Of the 10 cytogenetically abnormal fetuses, FISH was a
ble to identify correctly all 8 of the nonmosaic aneuploidies within 2
days of receipt of the specimen in the laboratory. Clinical decisions
can be made on the basis of concordant FISH and ultrasound abnormalit
ies, shortening the decision-making process for most of the aneuploid
cases. However, our experience demonstrates some of the limitations of
current FISH protocols and the continued necessity for formal karyoty
pe analysis.