Sj. Rune, TREATMENT STRATEGIES FOR SYMPTOM RESOLUTION, HEALING, AND HELICOBACTER-PYLORI ERADICATION IN DUODENAL-ULCER PATIENTS, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, 29, 1994, pp. 45-47
The introduction of anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy has increased the
number of options available for the management of patients with duode
nal ulcer disease. The aim of this paper is to summarize current knowl
edge and use it to form a strategy relevant to the management of patie
nts with duodenal ulcer disease. Four key aspects are addressed. (i) S
election of duodenal ulcer patients for anti-H. pylori treatment. As t
he subgroup of patients who will develop minor disease activity in the
future cannot be identified with sufficient precision, and the therap
eutic gain achieved by curing H. pylori infection is significant, all
patients with duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection should receive er
adication therapy. (ii) Confirmation of H. pylori infection before era
dication. A diagnostic test to confirm H. pylori infection is useful i
n identifying the small group of H. pylori-negative duodenal ulcer pat
ients with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced ulcer
or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. (iii) Choice of treatment. This should
be based on efficacy of eradication, rate of ulcer healing and symptom
resolution, adverse effects profile, simplicity and cost. At present,
there are four effective eradication therapies documented: omeprazole
plus amoxycillin or clarithromycin; omeprazole, amoxycillin and metro
nidazole; 'classic' triple therapy (bismuth, amoxycillin (or tetracycl
ine) and metronidazole); and ranitidine, amoxycillin and metronidazole
. (iv) Confirmation of eradication after treatment. This is needed cas
es in which the chosen therapy has an efficacy below 80-90%. The test
is important to identify those patients who require repeated treatment
, before they with an ulcer relapse.