Prior to European influence, predation by Native Americans was the maj
or factor limiting the numbers and distribution of ungulates in the In
termountain West. This hypothesis is based on analyses of (1) the effi
ciency of Native American predation, including cooperative hunting, us
e of dogs, food storage, use of nonungulate foods, and hunting methods
; (2) optimal-foraging studies; (3) tribal territory boundary zones as
prey reservoirs; (4) species ratios, and sex and age of aboriginal un
gulate kills; (5) impact of European diseases on aboriginal population
s; and (6) synergism between aboriginal and carnivore predation. Nativ
e Americans had no effective conservation practices, and the manner in
which they harvested ungulates was the exact opposite of any predicte
d conservation strategy. Native Americans acted in ways that maximized
their individual fitness regardless of the impact on the environment.
For humans, conservation is seldom an evolutionarily stable strategy.
By limiting ungulate numbers and purposefully modifying the vegetatio
n with fire, Native Americans structured entire plant and animal commu
nities. Because ecosystems with native peoples are entirely different
than those lacking aboriginal populations, a ''hands-off'' or ''natura
l regulation'' approach by today's land managers will not duplicate th
e ecological conditions under which those ecosystems developed. The mo
dem concept of wilderness as areas without human influence is a myth.
North America was not a ''wilderness'' waiting to be discovered, inste
ad it was home to tens of millions of aboriginal peoples before Europe
an-introduced diseases decimated their numbers.