The study of the discovery process in science is inhibited by the assu
mption that discovery is an event of short duration, not subject to in
ternal scrutiny, and by the focus on empirical studies as being the mo
st scientific. The argument is made that discoveries are often made by
a pattern recognition process. The discovery process, however, also i
ncludes the elaboration of a perceived pattern so that it may be commu
nicated and tested. The elaboration process includes development of a
descriptive vocabulary, elucidation of mathematical relations and meas
ures, development of instruments and techniques for measurement, and d
eduction of testable hypotheses. Thus discovery as a process can be ve
ry elaborate and prolonged and should be amenable to explicit study. I
mplications of this analysis for the practice of science and for scien
ce policy are also discussed.