Public opinion on government policy is group-centric: that is, strongl
y influenced by the attitudes citizens possess toward the social group
s perceived as the beneficiaries of the policy. Though commonplace, th
is mode of political thinking is not inevitable. In four experiments,
we show that group-centrism hinges in part on how issues are framed in
public debate. When issues are framed in ways that draw attention to
a policy's beneficiaries, group-centrism increases; when issues are fr
amed in ways that deflect attention away from the beneficiaries, group
-centrism declines. We conclude by drawing out the implications of the
se findings for the concept of frame, considered both as a rhetorical
weapon in elites' hands and as a cognitive structure in citizens' mind
s.