COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF LOW-OSMOLAR AND HIGH-OSMOLAR CONTRAST-MEDIA ONTHE RENAL-FUNCTION DURING EARLY DEGENERATIVE GENTAMICIN-INDUCED NEPHROPATHY IN RATS
Jm. Idee et al., COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF LOW-OSMOLAR AND HIGH-OSMOLAR CONTRAST-MEDIA ONTHE RENAL-FUNCTION DURING EARLY DEGENERATIVE GENTAMICIN-INDUCED NEPHROPATHY IN RATS, American journal of nephrology, 15(1), 1995, pp. 66-74
The nephrotoxic potentials of a high-osmolar contrast medium, diatrizo
ate, and of a low-osmolar contrast medium, ioxaglate, were compared du
ring early degenerative gentamicin-induced nephropathy in the rat. Mal
e rats (13-22/group) were uninephrectomized. Six days later, the aorta
was damped above the renal artery, and either diatrizoate or ioxaglat
e was administered (1 ml/min for 3 min) via an aortic puncture into th
e remaining kidney. Some of the rats received chronic treatment with g
entamicin (50 mg/kg/day i.m., 4 days), starting 2 days before and endi
ng 1 day after contrast medium administration. Two control groups, onl
y one of which received gentamicin, were subjected to a 3-min renal is
chemia. The creatinine clearance (CrCl) per 100 g body weight was dete
rmined before and 24 and 48 h after contrast medium injection. A secon
d study (6 rats/group) evaluated urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminida
se (NAG) excretion and the histologic appearance of the kidneys (blind
ed analysis) in the same experimental groups. Gentamicin induced a sig
nificant decrease in CrCl at baseline (0.35 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.41 +/- 0.19
ml/min; p < 0.01) and an increase in urinary NAG(128 +/- 92 vs. 39 +/
- 57 mu mol/h/mmol creatinine; p < 0.01). Taking into account these di
fferences at baseline, univariate repeated-measures analysis showed th
at on day 1 diatrizoate caused a more marked decrease in CrCl than iox
aglate (p < 0.05), whether or not gentamicin was also administered. On
day 2, the depressant effect of diatrizoate associated with gentamici
n persisted (CrCl vs. day 0 = -0.19 +/- 0.10 ml/min), while that of di
atrizoate alone returned to baseline (-0.05 +/- 0.24 ml/min). Converse
ly, the effects of ioxaglate did not differ from those of the control
groups at the two measuring times. Although the effects of contrast me
dium-gentamicin interaction were not significant for urinary NAG, the
gentamicin plus diatrizoate combination suggested greater toxic potent
ial than the gentamicin plus ioxaglate combination on day 2 (NAG vs. d
ay 0 = +260 +/- 528 vs. +22 +/- 119 mu mol/h/mmol creatinine). In cont
rast to ioxaglate alone, which only induced vacuolization, diatrizoate
alone provoked foci of tubular necrosis associated with vascular lesi
ons. Gentamicin alone induced irregular vacuolization. Contrary to the
findings for gentamicin plus diatrizoate, no necrotic foci were obser
ved with gentamicin plus ioxaglate. The nephrotoxic potential of diatr
izoate after intrarenal administration is greater than that of ioxagla
te administered in the rat during the early degenerative phase of gent
amicin-induced nephropathy.