E. Soreide et al., ACID ASPIRATION SYNDROME PROPHYLAXIS IN GYNECOLOGICAL AND OBSTETRIC PATIENTS - A NORWEGIAN SURVEY, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 38(8), 1994, pp. 863-868
Clinical practice and attitudes of Acid Aspiration Syndrome (AAS) prev
ention in connection with gynaecological and obstetric surgery were su
rveyed in all Norwegian departments of anaesthesia. General anaesthesi
a with rapid-sequence intubation using succinylcholine and cricoid pre
ssure was the preferred method for all emergency surgery, except Caesa
rian section (C-section) where 58% of the departments reported use of
spinal or epidural anaesthesia if time allowed for its use. Chemoproph
ylaxis was more often used before emergency C-section (60%) than befor
e emergency gynaecological surgery (14%), and mostly consisted of the
antacid sodium citrate given alone. Seventy-six percent of the departm
ents used mechanical emptying of the stomach before emergency gynaecol
ogical surgery and 44% before emergency C-section. While all responder
s considered recent intake of a ''light breakfast'' in an elective pat
ient to be a risk factor of AAS indicating delay of surgery or use of
specific precautions like regional anaesthesia, rapid-sequence intubat
ion, or chemoprophylaxis, 52-72% of the responders considered obesity,
dyspepsia, recent water intake, smoking or use of chewing gum to be r
isk factors as well. We think this survey demonstrates a need for cons
ensus discussions of AAS prophylaxis.