ACID ASPIRATION SYNDROME PROPHYLAXIS IN GYNECOLOGICAL AND OBSTETRIC PATIENTS - A NORWEGIAN SURVEY

Citation
E. Soreide et al., ACID ASPIRATION SYNDROME PROPHYLAXIS IN GYNECOLOGICAL AND OBSTETRIC PATIENTS - A NORWEGIAN SURVEY, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 38(8), 1994, pp. 863-868
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
ISSN journal
00015172
Volume
38
Issue
8
Year of publication
1994
Pages
863 - 868
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-5172(1994)38:8<863:AASPIG>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Clinical practice and attitudes of Acid Aspiration Syndrome (AAS) prev ention in connection with gynaecological and obstetric surgery were su rveyed in all Norwegian departments of anaesthesia. General anaesthesi a with rapid-sequence intubation using succinylcholine and cricoid pre ssure was the preferred method for all emergency surgery, except Caesa rian section (C-section) where 58% of the departments reported use of spinal or epidural anaesthesia if time allowed for its use. Chemoproph ylaxis was more often used before emergency C-section (60%) than befor e emergency gynaecological surgery (14%), and mostly consisted of the antacid sodium citrate given alone. Seventy-six percent of the departm ents used mechanical emptying of the stomach before emergency gynaecol ogical surgery and 44% before emergency C-section. While all responder s considered recent intake of a ''light breakfast'' in an elective pat ient to be a risk factor of AAS indicating delay of surgery or use of specific precautions like regional anaesthesia, rapid-sequence intubat ion, or chemoprophylaxis, 52-72% of the responders considered obesity, dyspepsia, recent water intake, smoking or use of chewing gum to be r isk factors as well. We think this survey demonstrates a need for cons ensus discussions of AAS prophylaxis.