The morphological appearances of the interface between the bone and th
e components of arthroplasties depend on multiple factors. Present-day
biomaterials being biocompatible when in bulk form, a host reaction c
onsequent upon untoward effects of the implants as such is not expecte
d. Thus, osseointegration, i.e., the direct apposition of bone to the
surface of a foreign material at the light microscopical level, occurs
, under favorable biomechanical circumstances, irrespective of the che
mical composition of the implant. Osseointegration is a multifaceted p
henomenon. First and foremost, it evolves when an initially rigid fixa
tion of the component is surgically attained. Interfacial motions are
associated with resorption of the bony bed, macrophagic activation and
production of wear particles, the close bone-implant apposition is lo
st and the formation of an interfacial membrane (IM) ensues. The histo
logical features of the IM coincide with the context of its formation
and evolution. The quiescent IM is composed of a thin layer of fibrous
tissue and its occurrence is compatible with the biofunctionality of
the implant. The aggressive or lytic IM (LIM) develops when tissue-irr
itating, small, irregularly shaped and edgy breakdown products are dep
osited at the interface. The thick LIM consists of an inflamed fibrous
tissue, scattered within which are myriad granulomas, and its surface
facing the implant displays a synovial-like aspect. The mono-and poly
karyonic macrophages, constituting the granulomatous response, ingest
and abut on the wear particles. Amongst the intermediary substances of
inflammation elaborated by the lymphocytes and macrophages of the LIM
, factors which stimulate the osteoclasts play the pivotal role in as
much as progressive bone resorption is associated with progressive gro
wth of the IM and, hence, with incremental interfacial motion, interfa
cial deposition of wear particles and inflammatory-granulomatous respo
nse. The ensuing vicious circle culminates in aseptic loosening of the
arthroplasty. The morphological features of the LIM, though character
ized by a stereotypical reaction pattern, are, in their details, close
ly linked with the nature of the diverse components of the composite j
oint replacement. The histological appearances of the bone-implant int
erface of stable and loose arthroplasties, the tissular reactions to p
olymethylmethacrylate, polyethylene, polyacetal, metals and hydroxyapa
tite as well as the characteristics of cemented acid cementless porous
-coated, press-fit and hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses are described.