DIFFERENTIAL CHANGES IN GLUTAMATE-RECEPTOR SUBUNIT MESSENGER-RNAS IN RAT-BRAIN AFTER HALOPERIDOL TREATMENT

Citation
Sl. Eastwood et al., DIFFERENTIAL CHANGES IN GLUTAMATE-RECEPTOR SUBUNIT MESSENGER-RNAS IN RAT-BRAIN AFTER HALOPERIDOL TREATMENT, J PSYCHOPH, 8(4), 1994, pp. 196-203
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy",Neurosciences,"Pharmacology & Pharmacy",Neurosciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
02698811 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
196 - 203
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-8811(1994)8:4<196:DCIGSM>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Glutamate receptors are implicated in several neuropsychiatric disorde rs and in the actions of neuroleptic drugs used to treat them. To help clarify how these drugs impinge upon the glutamatergic system, we hav e studied the effects of 2 weeks' haloperidol (2 mg kg(-1) d(-1)) upon the distribution and abundance of glutamate receptor mRNAs in rat bra in. The mRNAs detected were those encoding the glutamate-binding prote in (GBP), the N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (NR1 subunit) and t he flip and flop isoforms of lpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolp ropionate (AMPA)-preferring non-NMDA receptors gluR1 and gluR2. The mR NAs were studied using in situ hybridization histochemistry in dorsola teral striatum, nucleus accumbens, frontal cortex and hippocampus. Hal operidol led to an increase in GBP mRNA in striatum and frontal cortex but not in hippocampus. AMPA receptor mRNAs showed gene- and isoform- specific alterations in treated animals, with a significant increase i n the proportion of gluR2 flip compared to gluR2 flop. The gluR1 flop: gluR2 flop ratio also increased. No differences were observed for NR1 mRNA in any area. Thus, subchronic administration of haloperidol has a molecularly and spatially specific effect upon expression of glutamat e receptor-related transcripts. The data have several implications. Fi rstly, the enhanced expression of GBP mRNA may contribute to the alter ations in other glutamatergic parameters observed after neuroleptics. Secondly, the pattern of changes for the NMDA and AMPA receptor mRNAs suggests that the alterations in density of these receptors and their mRNAs reported in schizophrenia are not an artefact of neuroleptic tre atment. Finally, the specific increase in flip:flop mRNA ratio for glu R2, together with the increased proportion of gluR1 flop:gluR2 flop mR NA, is likely to affect the properties of the encoded AMPA receptors. Such changes may be relevant to the desired or undesired effects of th ese drugs.