RATE-ADAPTIVE CARDIAC PACING USING RIGHT-VENTRICULAR VENOUS OXYGEN-SATURATION - QUANTIFICATION OF CHRONOTROPIC BEHAVIOR DURING DAILY ACTIVITIES AND MAXIMAL EXERCISE
Cp. Lau et al., RATE-ADAPTIVE CARDIAC PACING USING RIGHT-VENTRICULAR VENOUS OXYGEN-SATURATION - QUANTIFICATION OF CHRONOTROPIC BEHAVIOR DURING DAILY ACTIVITIES AND MAXIMAL EXERCISE, PACE, 17(12), 1994, pp. 2236-2246
Central venous oxygen saturation (SVO2) closely reflects cardiac outpu
t and tissue oxygen consumption. In the absence of an adequate chronot
ropic response during exercise, SVO2 will decrease and the extent of d
esaturation may be used as a parameter for rate adaptive cardiac pacin
g. Eight patients with sinoatrial disease received a DDDR pacemaker ca
pable of DDDR pacing by sensing either SVO2 or piezoelectric detected
body movement. Both sensors were programmed to attain a rate of about
100 beats/min during walking, and with the lower and upper rates set a
t 50% and 90% of age predicted maximum, respectively. Chronotropic beh
avior of the two sensors were compared in the DDD mode with measuremen
t of sensor responses, during everyday activities (walking, stair clim
bing, postural changes, and physiological stresses) and at each quarti
le of workload during a continuous treadmill exercise test. During wal
king at 2.5 mph, both sensors showed no significant difference in dela
y time (both react within 15 sees) or half-time (SVO2 = 36 +/- 22 sec
and activity 24 +/-: 3 sec; P = NS), although SVO2 driven pacing achie
ved 90% target rate response slower than activity sensing (124 +/- 16
sec vs 77 +/- 10 sec; P < 0.02). SVO2 pacing was associated with a mor
e physiological rate response during walking upslope (68 +/- 12 beats/
min vs 57 +/- 10 beats/min; P < 0.05), ascending stairs (59 +/- 10 bea
ts/min vs 31 +/- 6 beats/min; P < 0.05), and standing (34 +/- 7 beats/
min vs 9 +/- 2 beats/min; P < 0.05). The SVO2 sensor significantly ove
rpaced in the first quartile of exercise (51.8 +/- 25.6% in excess of
heart rate expected from workload), but the rate was within 20% of exp
ected for the remainder of exercise. ''Underpacing'' was observed with
the activity sensor at the higher workload. In conclusion, the SVO2 s
ensor demonstrated a more physiological response to activities of dail
y living compared with the activity sensor. Using a quantitative metho
d, the speed of onset of rate response of the SVO2 sensor was comparab
le to activity sensing, and was more proportional in rate response. Si
gnificant overpacing occurs at the beginning of exercise during SVO2 d
riven pacing, which may be improved with the use of a curvilinear algo
rithm.