Normal subjects are better at identifying and remembering concrete as
compared to abstract words (the concreteness effect). We present data
on a patient, DM, who shows the opposite pattern. DM has a progressive
semantic loss due to atrophic changes in his temporal lobes, particul
arly on the left. His semantic impairment predominantly involves objec
t terms, with relative sparing of abstract nouns and most aspects of v
erb meaning. DM showed an advantage for abstract words on a wide range
of tasks (e.g. producing definitions, synonymy judgments). These data
challenge accounts that attribute the concreteness effect to a quanti
tative superiority at the level of the underlying conceptual represent
ations. We suggest that there are qualitative differences between abst
ract and concrete concepts, and that, in particular, concrete concepts
are more dependent on perceptual attributes that were disproportionat
ely impaired in DM. We propose, further, that perceptual components of
semantic representations are associated with structures in the inferi
or temporal lobe(s).