J. Gisby et al., STAPHYLOCOCCAL OSTEOMYELITIS - A COMPARISON OF CO-AMOXICLAV WITH CLINDAMYCIN AND FLUCLOXACILLIN IN AN EXPERIMENTAL RAT MODEL, Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 34(5), 1994, pp. 755-764
A rat model of Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis was used to compare
treatment with co-amoxiclav, flucloxacillin and clindamycin. Co-amoxi
clav (amoxyciliin/clavulanic acid 200/50 mg/kg), flucloxacillin (200 m
g/kg) and clindamycin (50 mg/kg) were injected subcutaneously tds for
28 days, commencing 14 days after infection. Eight days after cessatio
n of treatment, high numbers of staphylococci were recovered from the
infected tibiae of all control rats. All treatments, at clinically ach
ievable concentrations, significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the bone bact
erial titres. However, 50% of tibiae from co-amoxiclav-treated animals
were sterile, compared with 17% and 25% from flucloxacillin- or clind
amycin-treated animals respectively. Histopathological examination of
tibiae reflected the bacteriological results, and showed that the seve
rity of the osteomyelitis was greatly reduced in antibiotic-treated an
imals compared with non-treated controls. Twenty-eight days after cess
ation of therapy, bacterial counts from co-amoxiclav and clindamycin-t
reated animals remained significantly (P < 0.05) lower than those of n
on-treated controls, although the gross and microscopic appearance of
clindamycin and flucloxacillin-treated tibiae suggested that recrudesc
ence of the infection may have occurred. The results of this study dem
onstrated that co-amoxiclav was as effective as flucloxacillin and cli
ndamycin in the treatment of an experimental chronic staphylococcal os
teomyelitis.