This paper analyzes the role of chaos theory in educational theory and
research and asks whether or not the principles of the theory can inf
orm education. We contend that the application of the theory to educat
ion is misguided. The complexity of human behaviour is not adequately
accounted for in the theory and the original assumptions governing cha
os theory were not created to account for human behaviour. In the argu
ment an analogy is used to suggest that the education chaoticists are
committing an error similar to the behaviourists who use stimulus-resp
onse principles in education. Behaviourism is a misapplication of posi
tivistic philosophy and, likewise, educational chaoticists make an equ
ivalent leap of logic from using chaos theory as a perspective to conc
luding that chaos theory has all the answers for education. We argue t
hat it is not necessary, nor is it useful, to introduce chaos theory t
o understand education when we already have Whiteheadian process philo
sophy and constructivism to account for teaching and learning.