LINEAR VISCOELASTIC DIFFUSION IN THE POLY(STYRENE)-ETHYLBENZENE SYSTEM - COMPARISON BETWEEN THEORY AND EXPERIMENT

Citation
Gf. Billovits et Cj. Durning, LINEAR VISCOELASTIC DIFFUSION IN THE POLY(STYRENE)-ETHYLBENZENE SYSTEM - COMPARISON BETWEEN THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, Macromolecules, 27(26), 1994, pp. 7630-7644
Citations number
61
Categorie Soggetti
Polymer Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00249297
Volume
27
Issue
26
Year of publication
1994
Pages
7630 - 7644
Database
ISI
SICI code
0024-9297(1994)27:26<7630:LVDITP>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
We compare mutual diffusion data in the poly(styrene)-ethylbenzene sys tem with theory. The experiments(1) were differential vapor sorptions carried out at 40 degrees C on a thin film over a range of composition s spanning the system's glass transition. Under these conditions, visc oelastic relaxation strongly influences mutual diffusion, so that non- Fickian sorption data are seen, The theories considered(2,3) account f or the influence of relaxation by including fading memory in the mixtu re's free energy density. By fitting the data with the theory, we extr acted as a function of ethylbenzene weight fraction, w(1), the mutual binary diffusion coefficient, D-12, relaxation times, tau(1) and tau(2 ) (>tau(1)), and the ratio of the high-frequency mechanical modulus to the osmotic modulus, k(0). In the glassy state, D-12 and tau(1) remai n nearly constant, while in the liquid state they change rapidly with w(1) (D-12 increases; tau(1) decreases). The Vrentas-Duda free volume theory,(4,5) modified to account for the influence of the glass transi tion,(6,7) can account for the trends. The shorter relaxation time, ta u(1), agrees with mechanically measured relaxation times in the transi tion zone.(8,9) The longer time, tau(2), shows rough agreement with th e terminal time,(10,11) although the comparison is not definitive. The ratio ho is found to be constant, at similar to 0(10) over the entire concentration range, whereas the Flory-Huggins theory predicts that i t should slowly increase with w(1); the reasons for the discrepancy ar e not clear.