Traumatic rupture of the aorta is a major cause of morbidity and morta
lity in rapid deceleration road traffic accidents, with an immediate m
ortality of 85%. Of the 15% that survive the initial injury, approxima
tely 50% will die within 24 h if left untreated. Prompt diagnosis and
early surgical treatment are necessary if such patients are to survive
. Aortography is the standard investigation of choice and provides a r
apid, sensitive test of aortic rupture. Other modalities, such as plai
n chest radiography, computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound may also
play a role in diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with its m
ulti-planar imaging capability, is now widely used for imaging non-tra
umatic disorders of the aorta. However, its use in traumatic rupture h
as been limited by difficulties in monitoring and in access to the pat
ient during the scan. We present a patient who survived the initial in
jury, when the diagnosis of aortic rupture was not suspected, and pres
ented 3 weeks later with chest pain. An MRI scan was feasible as the p
atient was haemodynamically stable, and it provided an elegant non-inv
asive means of diagnosis, so that aortography was not necessary in thi
s case. Although aortography is likely to remain the investigation of
choice in the acute situation, MRI is a useful alternative in selected
cases.