Predicting the rate of leaf appearance, or phyllochron, aids in unders
tanding and modeling grass development and growth. Nine equations pred
icting the phyllochron of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated
using field data from a variety of locations, cultivars, and managemen
t practices. Each equation is referred to by the last name of the firs
t author; if there is more than one equation by the first author, addi
tional descriptors were included. The BAKER and KIRBY equations predic
t the phyllochron based on changes in daylength following seedling eme
rgence; CAO-TEMP and CAO-DAY use a curvilinear relationship with tempe
rature and daylength, respectively; CAO-T&D uses the ratio of temperat
ure to daylength; VOLK mathematically refines CAO-T&D; MIGLIETTA uses
an ontogenetic decline in the rate of leaf appearance; and MIGLIETTA-D
AY adds photoperiod effects to MIGLIETTA. No equation adequately predi
cted the phyllochron. The r(2) values between predicted and measured p
hyllochron for winter wheat and spring wheat cultivars, respectively,
were BAKER (0.001, 0.486), KIRBY (0.002, 0.487), CAO-DAY (0.000, 0.174
), MIGLIETTA-DAY (0.013, 0.008), MIGLIETTA (0.002, 0.405), CAO-TEMP (0
.100, 0.190), CAO-FIELD (0.078, 0.036), CAO-T&D (0.066, 0.030), and VO
LK (0.119, 0.043). All equations predicted the phyllochron for spring
wheat cultivars better than winter wheat cultivars. BAKER and MIGLIETT
A showed no bias towards either over or underestimating the phyllochro
n; KIRBY tended to overestimate the phyllochron; and the remaining equ
ations were biased towards underestimating the phyllochron. Equations
developed from field data had the greatest range of predicted phylloch
rons. Based on multiple criteria, the BAKER equation best predicted th
e phyllochron for the experimental data set. Other factors must be add
ed to the equations to improve predictions. Much opportunity exists to
improve our ability to predict the phyllochron.