An analytical model is developed to study the problem of designing sta
ble joint ventures aimed at jointly developing and supplying a new tec
hnology. The analysis focuses on the extent to which traditional motiv
es for joint ventures like cost sharing, synergy effects or technologi
cal spillovers may shape the incentives for firms to cheat on the arra
ngement and hence despite larger cooperative benefits, endanger the fo
rmation of a stable agreement. The cheating firm, although supplying t
he contractually specified inputs to the venture, manages to keep its
know-how proprietary while benefiting from the loyal partner's know-ho
w through spillovers from the venture. Only if know-how can be kept su
fficiently proprietary within the venture, will synergy effects stimul
ate the formation of a stable joint venture, increasing the profitabil
ity of cooperation while at the same time stifling the incentives to c
heat. But if know-how becomes difficult to appropriate, synergy effect
s may increase the incentives to cheat, resulting in no agreement at l
east when both parties have perfect foresight.