REDUCTION OF VENTILATOR SETTINGS ALLOWED BY INTRAVENOUS OXYGENATOR (IVOX) IN ARDS PATIENTS

Citation
Jp. Mira et al., REDUCTION OF VENTILATOR SETTINGS ALLOWED BY INTRAVENOUS OXYGENATOR (IVOX) IN ARDS PATIENTS, Intensive care medicine, 21(1), 1995, pp. 11-17
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
Journal title
ISSN journal
03424642
Volume
21
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
11 - 17
Database
ISI
SICI code
0342-4642(1995)21:1<11:ROVSAB>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the possibility of reducing ventilator settings to ''safe'' levels by extrapulmonary gas exchange with IVOX in ARDS p atients. Design: Uncontrolled open clinical study. Setting: Medical In tensive Care Unit of a University Hospital. Patients: 6 patients with ARDS who entered into IVOX phase II clinical trials. Interventions: Th e end-point of this study was to reduce ventilator settings from the i nitial values, recorded on the da of inclusion, to the following: peak inspiratory pressure < 40 cmH2O, mean airway pressure < 25 cmH2O and tidal volume < 10 ml/kg. Trials to achieve this goal were made on volu me-controlled ventilation within the 24 h before and after IVOX insert ion. Comparison of the results achieved during these trials used Wilco xon test. Results: Before IVOX implantation reduction of ventilator se ttings was not possible in the 6 patients, despite a non-significant i ncrease in PaO2/FIO2 was achieved. IVOX permitted significant decrease in PaCO2 (from 60.5 +/- 15 to 52 +/- 11 mmHg; p = 0.02) before any mo dification of the ventilatory mode. After IVOX insertion, a significan t decrease of the ventilator settings was performed: peak and mean air way pressures dropped from 44 +/- 10 to 36.8 +/- 6.7; p = 0.02 and fro m 26.3 +/- 5.6 to 22.5 +/- 3.9 cmH2O; p = 0.02, respectively. Concommi tantly, PaCO2 remained unchanged and PaO2/FIO2 increased significantly from 93 +/- 28 to 117 +/- 52; p = 0.04. The interruption of oxygen fl ow on IVOX was associated with a slight decrease of the oxygen variabl es. Tolerance of IVOX was satisfactory. However, a significant decreas e both in cardiac index and in pulmonary wedge pressures (from 4.5 +/- 1.2 to 3.4 +/- 9; p = 0.03 and from 16 +/- 5 to 11 +/- 2; p = 0.04, r espectively) was observed. Conclusion: Gas exchange achieved by IVOX a llowed reduction of ventilator settings in 6 ARDS patients in whom pre vious attempts have failed. CO2 removal by the device, may explain the se results. Efficacy of IVOX on arterial oxygenation was uncertain.