The differentiation between significant mechanical obstruction and non
obstructive dilation of the kidneys and ureters is fundamental to pati
ent management. The diuretic renal scan is a useful test in this situa
tion because it usually is reliable and reproducible and is noninvasiv
e and objective, providing information about the function of each kidn
ey. However, this study has given variable results in a small number o
f patients. We report our experience with five such patients and recom
mend an algorithm for evaluating patients with equivocal scan results.
This report emphasizes the importance of continued follow-up and the
need for periodic reevaluation of patients with unexplained urinary sy
mptoms or persistent flank pain, even when the initial diuretic renal
scan is normal.