Clinical diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is unreliable, and tr
eatment should not be undertaken without objective confirmation. The t
raditional 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of DVT has been venograph
y, but ultrasonic imaging has now replaced venography as the new diagn
ostic standard in many hospitals. A variety of noninvasive physiologic
tests are also useful in selected circumstances. These include plethy
smography, Doppler flow studies, radioisotope tests, thermography and
peripheral blood tests which reflect activation of coagulation or thro
mbolysis. We describe the clinical application of these diagnostic pro
cedures, both for symptomatic patients suspected to have DVT and for a
symptomatic patients at high risk for DVT. The selection of an appropr
iate diagnostic modality depends upon institutional capabilities, cost
-effectiveness and individual patient circumstances.