In rectal cancer, endosonography assesses the tumor penetration depth,
EUS T1 to EUS T3, with a sensitivity of 96 % and a specificity of 89
%. The evaluation of lymph nodes is less accurate, at 79 %. The surgic
al strategy is different in the three parts of the rectum, and depends
on the endosonographic tumor stage: upper third of the rectum - anter
ior resection for all tumor stages; middle third of the rectum - EUS T
1 N0: transanal endoscopic microsurgery for ''low-risk'' carcinomas; E
US T1-2: anterior resection; EUS T3: anterior resection with complete
excision of the mesorectum, reconstruction with coloanal pouch; lower
third of the rectum - EUS T1 N0: transanal endoscopic microsurgery for
''low-risk'' carcinomas; EUS T1-2: anterior or intersphincteric resec
tion with complete excision of the mesorectum, reconstruction with col
on pouch; EUS T3: abdominoperineal excision. With the impact of endoso
nography, the proportion of abdominoperineal excisions has dropped fro
m 46 % to 15 % during the last five years. Laparoscopic technology is
likely to have an increasing impact on surgical procedures that have p
reviously required an open approach. The following treatment policy de
rived from the endosonographic staging of colon tumors is proposed: EU
S T1, laparoscopic segmental resection; EUS T2, laparoscopic oncologic
al resection; EUS T3, conventional open surgery.