S. Rohmann et al., INVOLVEMENT OF ATP-SENSITIVE POTASSIUM CHANNELS IN PRECONDITIONING PROTECTION, Basic research in cardiology, 89(6), 1994, pp. 563-576
Single or multiple brief periods of ischemia (preconditioning, PC) hav
e been shown to protect the myocardium from infarction during a subseq
uent more prolonged ischemic insult. To test the hypothesis that openi
ng of ATP-sensitive potassium channels (K-ATP) is involved in this mec
hanism, either bimakalim, a K-ATP channel opener, or glibenclamide, a
K-ATP channel blocker, were administered to mimic or to block precondi
tioning protection in barbital-anesthetized pigs. PC was elicited by a
single period of 10 min left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD
CA) occlusion followed by 15 min of reperfusion before the LADCA was r
eoccluded for 60 min. Instead of PC, bimakalim infusion was started 15
min before the 60 min LADCA occlusion (TCO) and stopped with the onse
t of ischemia. Glibenclamide was administered either for 10 min prior
to the PC protocol, before bimakalim infusion, or before TCO. Regional
wall function was quantified with ultrasonic crystals aligned to meas
ure wall thickening (%Delta WT). At the end of the protocol, infarct s
ize was determined by incubating myocardium with p-nitrobluetetrazoliu
m. In seven preconditioned pigs, infarct size was 9.9 +/- 5.1% of the
risk region compared with 65.9 +/- 6.0% in the seven control pigs subj
ected to 60 min of ischemia only (p<0.001). In seven pigs treated with
bimakalim, infarct size was reduced to 35.3 +/- 6.6 (p<0.05 vs. contr
ols). Blocking ATP-sensitive potassium channels with glibenclamide pri
or to PC abolished its protective effect (infarct size, 62.2 +/- 4.5%;
p<0.001 vs. PC alone). Glibenclamide also antagonized the protective
effect of bimakalim (infarct size, 55.2 +/- 4.0%), but did not affect
infarct size, when solely administered prior to the prolonged ischemic
period (62.2 +/- 4.3%). We conclude that in swine myocardium K-ATP ch
annels are involved in the protective effect of ischemic preconditioni
ng, since glibenclamide completely abolished the protective effect of
preconditioning, while bimakalim could - at least in part - mimic it.