F. Legent et Jf. Arnould, PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS IN ENT AND STOMA TOLOGICAL SURGERY, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation, 13(5), 1994, pp. 100-109
Postsurgical infection has always been a cause for major concern in EN
T surgey. Papers on the topic allowed to identify indications for anti
biotic prophylaxis. In ear surgery, in the absence of prior infection
(stapes surgery, medium dry ear surgery), studies' results are not in
favour of antibiotic prophylaxis. On the other hand, however, when the
ear is inflamed or infected, the use of antibiotics is indicated, if
possible after having first taken a sample. For nose and sinus surgery
, antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be worthless in the absence of a pro
longed packing. If a packing has to be maintained or if a transplant i
s used, an antibiotic adminstration has to be considered; the most app
ropriate antibiotic and its mode of use still have to be specified. In
case of facial trauma, antibiotic prophylaxis using cefazolin reduces
the risk of infection of paraymphysis fractures and angle fractures.
The postoperative course after tonsillectomy is simplified by a prolon
ged antibiotic administration based on ampicillin. In clean cervicofac
ial surgery, without buccopharyngeal opening, the antibiotic prophylax
is seems to be worthless. In the opposite, antibiotherapy is required
in case of buccopharyngeal opening. Indeed the presence of potential p
athogenic bacteria in the buccopharyngeal cavity, the difficulties of
mucosa closing, the importance of the tumoral extension, the length of
the procedure, radiotherapy and use of myocutaneous flaps may all be
the cause of a high infection rate (80 %) in the absence of antibiotic
prophylaxis. Two types of antibiotics seem to be suitable, cefazolin
and clindamycin. Antibiotics active against Gram negative bacteria see
m to be useless. There is a disagreement concerning the duration of an
tibiotic administration. The populations studied are too small to obta
in significant results. Both points of view (prolonged antibiotic admi
nistration or true antibiotic prophylaxis) can be considered. Only lar
ge scale prospective studies with an adequate methodology will provide
credible data for this debate.