M. Orell et al., TO BREED OR NOT TO BREED - CAUSES AND IMPLICATIONS OF NON-BREEDING HABIT IN THE WILLOW TIT PARAS-MONTANUS, Oecologia, 100(3), 1994, pp. 339-346
Causes and consequences of non-breeding in willow tits were studied in
northern Finland during 1986-1992. The breeding status was sex and ag
e biased; males and yearling birds were in excess among the non-reprod
ucers. Due to sex bias in the population it appeared detrimental for m
ales to lose a mate, especially shortly before breeding. Lack of a mat
e was a more important factor for males not reproducing (37% of non-br
eeding males) than for females (14%). Most of the non-breeding birds m
aintained a pair bond which only rarely broke up for the next breeding
season (divorce rate 5.5%). This implies that parental incompatibilit
y is not a possible explanation for pairs not reproducing. Males that
did not breed tended to survive better than reproducing ones, whereas
such a relationship was not found for females. It is possible that thi
s sex-related difference in survival cost is attributable to quality d
ifferences among non-breeding individuals. It was especially low-quali
ty yearling females, with low survival prospects, that were responsibl
e for the discrepancy. The proportion of non-breeding females in the p
opulation correlated highly with clutch size and subsequent juvenile s
urvival. It is therefore suggested that for most of these females non-
breeding is a phenotypic response to low offspring value in the prevai
ling circumstances (inter-generational tradeoff). However, it is uncer
tain whether willow tits in a northern population can use breeding den
sity as an indicator of changing survival prospects of their descendan
ts, as suggested by Ekman and Askenmo (1986) for southern Sweden.