This paper examines different levels of analytical sophistication in t
he treatment of uncertainties in risk analysis, and the possibility of
transfer of experience across fields of application. First, this pape
r describes deterministic and probabilistic methods of treatment of ri
sk and uncertainties, and the different viewpoints that shape these an
alyses. Second, six different levels of treatment of uncertainty are p
resented and discussed in the light of the evolution of the risk manag
ement philosophy in the US. Because an in-depth treatment of uncertain
ties can be complex and costly, this paper then discusses when and why
a full (two-tier) uncertainty analysis is justified. In the treatment
of epistemic uncertainty, an unavoidable and difficult problem is the
encoding of probability distributions based on scientific evidence an
d expert judgments. The last sections include a description of differe
nt approaches to the aggregation of expert opinions and their use in r
isk analysis, and a recent example of methodology and application (in
seismic hazard analysis) that can be transferred to other domains. (C)
1996 Elsevier Science Limited