D. Gill et Er. Kendall, THE ABOLISHMENT OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS - PARKVIEWS STORY, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 20(12), 1994, pp. 669-678
Background: Traditional performance appraisals, with their emphasis on
individual (versus systemic or organizational) performance, are thoug
ht to undermine efforts to implement a total quality management or con
tinuous quality improvement strategy. Searching for a new process: A t
eam charged in 1989 with the mission of improving the performance eval
uation process finally determined it was simply not possible to improv
e a system so fundamentally flawed and recommended eliminating it. As
an interim step, directors were told to dispense with scores and simpl
y provide feedback to employees. A model for doing this was later adop
ted as the template for the annual feedback meeting Parkview eventuall
y developed. A Piece of Paper (APOP) is born: The breakthrough, in 199
2, came in realizing that an annual meeting should focus not on evalua
ting the employees but rather on identifying processes and systems in
need of improvement. APOP in practice: Managers and employees alike vi
ew APOP as an improvement over the old performance appraisals. One dir
ector sees APOP as a way of finding out what is going on in her depart
ment and how she can help. Another director finds that APOP not only h
elps him recognize the needs of good employees but also helps him to w
ork constructively with employees having problems. Holding the gain: S
eventy-two percent of the directors have a highly favorable opinion of
APOP; employees will be surveyed soon. Additional training in the APO
P philosophy and process for first-line supervisors and follow-up trai
ning for leaders will be provided.