E. Zio et Ge. Apostolakis, 2 METHODS FOR THE STRUCTURED ASSESSMENT OF MODEL UNCERTAINTY BY EXPERTS IN PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS OF RADIOACTIVE-WASTE REPOSITORIES, Reliability engineering & systems safety, 54(2-3), 1996, pp. 225-241
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Operatione Research & Management Science","Engineering, Industrial
The assessment of the performance of high-level radioactive waste repo
sitories is based on the use of models for predicting system behaviour
. The complexity of the system together with the large spatial and tem
poral scales imposed by the regulations introduce large uncertainties
in the analysis. The difficulty of validating the relevant models crea
tes the need of assessing their validity by means of expert judgments.
This paper addresses the problem of model uncertainty both from a the
oretical and a practical point of view and presents two mathematical a
pproaches to the treatment of model uncertainty that can assist the ex
perts in the formulation of their judgments. The formal elicitation of
expert judgments is investigated within the Technical Facilitator/lnt
egrator (TFI) framework that has been proposed by the Senior Seismic H
azard Analysis Committee,Within this framework, the mathematical formu
lations for the treatment of model uncertainty are regarded as tools f
or sensitivity analyses that give insights into the model characterist
ics and are helpful in structuring the expert opinion elicitation proc
ess itself. The first approach, referred to as the alternate-hypothese
s formulation, amounts to constructing a suitable set of plausible hyp
otheses and evaluating their validity. The second approach to model un
certainty is referred to as the adjustment-factor formulation and it r
equires that a reference model be identified and its predictions be di
rectly modified through an adjustment factor that accounts for the unc
ertainty in the models. Furthermore, both approaches require a clear u
nderstanding of the distinction between aleatory and epistemic uncerta
inties. The implications that these two formulations have on, and the
issues that they raise in, the elicitation of expert opinions are expl
ored. A case study of model uncertainty regarding alternative models f
or the description of groundwater flow and contaminant transport in un
saturated, fractured tuff is presented. (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Limi
ted.