Karmiloff-Smith's developmental perspective forces us to recognize tha
t there are many levels at which knowledge can be represented. We firs
t offer empirical support for a distinction made on theoretical ground
s between two such levels. We then argue that ''redescription'' onto a
new level need not await success (as Karmiloff-Smith proposes), and t
hat this modification of the theory has important implications for the
role redescription plays in development.