S. Pan et al., HISTOLOGICAL MATURITY OF HEALED DUODENAL ULCER AND ULCER RECURRENCE AFTER TREATMENT WITH OMEPRAZOLE OR CIMETIDINE, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 9, 1994, pp. 84-87
We investigated the relationship between histological maturity of heal
ed duodenal ulcer and ulcer recurrence after treatment with omeprazole
or cimetidine for 4 weeks. The healing rates, 92.5 and 72.4% in omepr
azole-treated and cimetidine-treated groups, respectively, showed no s
ignificant difference between groups (P > 0.05). Histologically, the r
egenerating mucosa of healed ulcer was divided into three categories:
good, fair and poor patterns. Of the healed cases, 22 (59.5%) of 37 om
eprazole-treated and 12 (28.6%) of 42 cimetidine-treated ulcers achiev
ed a good pattern, showing significant difference between groups (P =
0.01). The recurrence rate at 3 months showed statistically significan
t difference (P < 0.05) between two groups: 5.4% in omeprazole-treated
and 23.8% in cimetidine-treated patients. During the period between 3
and 6 months after healing, the difference in recurrence rate between
omeprazole-treated and cimetidine-treated groups was statistically no
t significant (12.5% and 25%, respectively, P > 0.05), though the cumu
lative recurrence rate at 6 months showed a significant difference bet
ween groups (17.6% vs 44.7%, P = 0.027). All the recurrent cases of bo
th groups had a fair or poor pattern of regenerating mucosa. The diffe
rence in recurrence rate was statistically significant between the hea
led ulcers with a good pattern and that with a fair or poor patterns b
oth at 3 months and between 3 and 6 months after healing (P < 0.001 in
each). We concluded that better histological maturity of regenerating
mucosa may contribute to the lower early recurrence in omeprazole-tre
ated cases than in cimetidine-treated cases.