Ps. Myles et al., COMPARISON OF PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA AND NURSE-CONTROLLED INFUSION ANALGESIA AFTER CARDIAC-SURGERY, Anaesthesia and intensive care, 22(6), 1994, pp. 672-678
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology,"Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on 72 patients u
ndergoing elective cardiac surgery to compare patient-controlled analg
esia (PCA) to nurse-titrated infusion of morphine. Pain and nausea sco
res were assessed at 5, 20, 32 and 44 hours after cardiopulmonary bypa
ss. Serum cortisol estimations were performed at 24 and 48 hours, and
morphine consumption was measured at 0-24 and 24-48 hours. There was n
o difference between pain scores (P=0.72), nausea scores (P=0.52), ser
um cortisol at 24 and 48 hours (P=0.32 and P=0.34) and morphine consum
ption at 0-24 and 24-48 hours (P=0.16 and P=0.12). There was also no d
ifference in the time to tracheal extubation (P=0.79) and discharge fr
om ICU (P=0.64). There was a significant association bet ween pain and
serum cortisol at 48 hours (P=0.023). This study also found a tenfold
difference in the amount of morphine used (range = 11 to 108 mg), wit
h no significant association with patient age or sex. We could find no
significant benefit from the routine use of PCA in cardiac surgical p
atients.