Tn. Denny et al., QUANTITATIVE-DETERMINATION OF SURFACE ANTIBODY-BINDING CAPACITIES OF IMMUNE SUBSETS PRESENT IN PERIPHERAL-BLOOD OF HEALTHY ADULT DONORS, Cytometry, 26(4), 1996, pp. 265-274
The objective of this study was to quantitate the antibody binding cap
acity (ABC) of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD16, and CD19 on lymphocytes and CD4 on
monocytes from healthy adult donors. Peripheral blood was collected o
ver three consecutive days and repeated in the same format two weeks l
ater for comparison to initial measurements. Immune subsets were label
ed by direct single or two-color staining in whole blood followed by l
ysis of erythrocytes. Fluorescence intensity measurements were made by
carefully calibrating the flow cytometer and then measuring the inten
sity of monoclonal antibody staining on labeled cells and on Quantum S
imply Cellular Microbeads. The effect of paraformaldehyde fixation on
intensity measurements and coefficient of variation of thirty replicat
es for each phenotype were also studied. We found a small change in ca
lculated ABC following overnight fixation with a greater change follow
ing 48 h of fixation prior to flow cytometric analysis. We found excel
lent precision could be achieved for measuring the ABC of most markers
with some improvement desirable for expression of CD4 on monocytes an
d CD16(+) lymphocytes. Between donors we found a high-law range of CD3
(+) = 134,34-45,905; CD4(+) (lymphocytes) = 54,174-36,106; CD4(+)(mono
cytes) = 9,246-3094; CD8(+) = 268,868-190,622; CD3(+)CD8(+) = 269,858-
212,024; CD16(+) = 38,307-336; and CD19(+) = 25,252-11,689. For the to
tal donor group, the observations at week 1 and week 2 were not signif
icantly different (alpha = .05) for any of the immunophenotypes we stu
died. The data presented here continue to show that it is possible to
perform quantitative intensity measurements of immune subsets when per
forming immunophenotyping studies. (C) 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.