1. Single cortical neurons are known to respond to visual stimuli cont
aining Fourier components only in a narrow range of spatial frequencie
s. This investigation demonstrates that some neurons in cat area 17 an
d 18 can also respond to certain stimuli that have no Fourier componen
ts inside the cell's luminance spatial frequency passband. 2. To study
such ''non-Fourier'' responses, we used envelope stimuli that consist
ed of a high-spatial-frequency sinusoidal luminance grating (carrier)
whose contrast was modulated by a low-spatial frequency sine wave (env
elope). There was no Fourier component at the apparent periodicity of
the envelope spatial frequency. However, some cells responded to such
a ''phantom'' component of the envelope modulation when it fell inside
the cell's luminance spatial frequency passband while all the real Fo
urier components in the stimuli were outside.3. We conducted extensive
control experiments to eliminate the possibility of producing artifac
tual responses to the envelope stimuli due to any small residual nonli
nearity of the z-linearized CRT screen. The control experiments includ
ed I)testing of screen linearity to ensure that the effect from the re
sidual screen nonlinearity was no larger than the sensitivity level of
visual responses and 2) comparing the responses to envelope stimuli w
ith the responses to the equivalent contrast of the artifact produced
by the screen nonlinearity. All these control experiments indicated th
at any effect of screen nonlinearity did not contribute significantly
to the neural envelope responses. 4. We performed a statistical analys
is to obtain an index of relative strength of envelope responses for e
ach cell and to objectively classify cells as ''envelope-responsive''
or ''non-envelope-responsive.'' A clear segregation between envelope-r
esponsive and non-envelope-responsive cells was observed in the distri
bution of relative envelope response strength. 5. The distribution of
envelope-responsive cells exhibited a bias between the two cortical ar
eas and between simple versus complex cell types in area 17. About hal
f of the simple cells and most of the complex cells in area 18 were en
velope responsive, whereas only 1 of 12 simple and a minority of compl
ex cells in area 17 were. 6. The strength of envelope responses was ge
nerally smaller than that of responses to luminance grating stimuli at
the same contrast. However, both the envelope and luminance responses
were consistent for a given neuron in direction selectivity, orientat
ion selectivity, and temporal modulation. 7. The existence of such env
elope-responsive cells implicates areas 17 and 18 as a neural basis fo
r the early processing of non-Fourier aspects of visual information th
at have been extensively demonstrated by human psychophysics.