H. Poty et al., TREATMENT OF SUPRAVENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS BY PERMANENT PACING, Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux, 87(11), 1994, pp. 1527-1533
Most pacemakers are used for the treatment of bradyarrhythmias. Howeve
r, a small number of pacemakers has been implanted for the treatment o
f supraventricular tachycardia resistant to medical therapy. The resul
ts of small reported series show long-term pacing to be effective in t
erminating reentrant atrial and junctional tachycardia. This has led t
o an improved quality of life and fewer hospital admissions in the maj
ority of patients. Although there are a number of limitations to the w
idespread use of this mode of treatment, the development of pacing tec
hniques has improved our understanding of the mechanism of termination
of tachycardia which has been fully used in ventricular tachyarrhythm
ias. In addition to the curative treatment of sustained junctional tac
hycardia, pacemakers have been implanted to prevent the occurrence of
new episodes with seemingly equally satisfactory results. However, car
diac pacing for this indication is much less common now because of the
very good results obtained recently by radiofrequency ablation techni
ques. The prevention of atrial arrhythmias, vagally-induced atrial tac
hyarrhythmias and the bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome are good indica
tions for permanent pacing. The prevention of atrial fibrillation in s
inus node dysfunction by pacing is becoming more popular with the emer
gence of new modes (DDI and rate-adjusted modes) and original arrhythm
ia preventing algorithms. The discussion about the real efficacy of at
rial pacing in sinus node dysfunction is disappearing as results of pr
ospective randomised trials confirming this efficacy become available,
especially in preventing atrial fibrillation.