Ag. Freifeld et al., MONOTHERAPY FOR FEVER AND NEUTROPENIA IN CANCER-PATIENTS - A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF CEFTAZIDIME VERSUS IMIPENEM, Journal of clinical oncology, 13(1), 1995, pp. 165-176
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of ceftazidime and imipenem monothera
py for fever and neutropenia, and to determine whether fewer antimicro
bial modifications (additions or changes) are required by the broader-
spectrum agent, imipenem. Patients and Methods: Adult and pediatric pa
tients undergoing chemotherapy for solid tumors, leukemias, or lymphom
as were randomized to receive open-label ceftazidime or imipenem on pr
esentation with fever and neutropenia. Success with or without modific
ations of the initial antibiotic was defined os survival through neutr
openia; failure was death due to infection. Comparisons were based on
numbers of modifications made to each monotherapy during the course of
neutropenia, in patients stratified as having unexplained fever or a
documented infection. Results: Among 204 ceftazidime and 195 imipenem
recipients, the overall success rate with or without modification was
more than 98%, regardless of initial antibiotic regimen. Modifications
occurred in half of all episodes, primarily in patients with document
ed infections on either monotherapy. Antianaerobic agents were more fr
equently added to ceftazidime (P < .001), but addition of other antibi
otics, including vancomycin and aminoglycosides, was similar between t
he two monotherapy groups. Imipenem therapy was associated with signif
icantly greater toxicity, manifested by Clostridium difficile-associat
ed diarrhea and by nausea and vomiting, which required discontinuation
of imipenem in 10% of recipients. Conclusion: Ceftazidime and imipene
m are both effective in the management of fever and chemotherapy-relat
ed neutropenia, provided that modifications are mode in response to cl
inical and microbiologic data that emerge during the course of neutrop
enia. Imipenem, despite its broader antimicrobial spectrum, does not s
ignificantly decrease the overall need for antibiotic modifications an
d is more often complicated by gastrointestinal toxicity.