Objective-To analyse the changes in mortality in dilated cardiomyopath
y over the past 15 years and to identify the factors that might have i
nfluenced survival. Design-Follow up study of 235 patients (aged 16-70
) systematically enrolled on a register from 1 January 1978 to 31 Dece
mber 1992. Setting-Hospital department of cardiology. Patients-Three g
roups corresponding to three periods of 5 years: group 1 (diagnosis be
tween 1 January 1978 and 31 December 1982) 26 patients; group 2 (diagn
osis between 1 January 1983 and 31 December 1987) 65 patients; and gro
up 3 (diagnosis between 1 January 1988 and 31 December 1992) 144 patie
nts. Main outcome measures-Death or heart transplantation. Results-Two
and four year survival was 73.8% and 53.8% in group 1, 87.7% and 72.3
% in group 2, and 90.3% and 82.9% in group 3 (P = 0.02). During the 15
years of the study period the number of cases increased progressively
and the baseline clinical characteristics changed (that is, patients
were younger and less severely affected), partly explaining the improv
ement in survival. None the less, the three mortality curves tended to
diverge progressively and the improvement in survival in the differen
t groups was still significant after stratification for the severity o
f the disease, suggesting that treatment had a sustained effect. A pro
gressively higher proportion of patients were treated with angiotensin
converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and more recently with beta blocke
rs. In group 2, after stratification for the severity of heart failure
, patients who were treated with ACE inhibitors showed a better surviv
al than patients who were not. Furthermore, analysis of group 3 showed
that beta blockers had a significant additive effect with conventiona
l therapy both by intention to treat and actual treatment. Four year s
urvival in patients with mild and moderate to severe heart failure tre
ated with beta blockers, and usually digitalis and ACE inhibitors, was
respectively 90% and 87.5%. Conclusions-The improvement in the surviv
al of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy over the past 15 years may
be explained by earlier diagnosis, new treatments, and a change in the
clinical characteristics of the patients at enrolment.