Ky. Li et al., FIELD-TEST AND MATHEMATICAL-MODELING OF BIOREMEDIATION OF AN OIL-CONTAMINATED SOIL .1. FIELD-TEST, Waste management, 14(7), 1994, pp. 561-569
A fire-wall area (about 270' x 310') with the Bunker C oil contaminate
d soil was. selected for the bioremediation field test. This fire-wall
area was separated into 18 plots by dirt dikes to test 6 bioremediati
on methods with three tests of each method. The six treatment methods
were: a) Aeration with basic nutrients and indigenous organisms (BNIO)
; b) Aeration with basic nutrients and inoculation from a refinery was
tewater treatment facility (BNSIWT); c) Aeration with an oleophilic fe
rtilizer and indigenous organisms (INIPOL); d) Aeration with basic nut
rients and biosurfactant organisms (EPA Seal Beach consortia) (EPA); e
) Aeration with proprietary nutrients and organisms (PRO); and f) Aera
tion only for active control (CONTROL). This field test was conducted
for 91 days. In general the oil contents in 18 plots were reduced, but
the results showed significant fluctuations. A statistical method was
used to examine if the oil reductions of six methods were the results
from the random error of sampling and sample analysis or biodegradati
on. The results of the statistical analysis showed that oil reduction
was concluded from all but the plots of PRO. From the data analysis, i
t may be concluded that the oil reduction rate in these studies is con
trolled by oil transfer from soil into the aqueous solution. An exampl
e of calculation was used to illustrate this conclusion.