B. Tebbe et al., IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF CHRONIC DISCOID AND SUBACUTE CUTANEOUS LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS - RELATION TO IMMUNOPATHOLOGICAL MECHANISMS, British journal of dermatology, 132(1), 1995, pp. 25-31
An immunohistochemical analysis of skin biopsies was performed in 18 p
atients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE), using the alkaline ph
osphatase and monoclonal anti-alkaline phosphatase method (APAAP). The
study group was subdivided on the basis of clinical criteria into 10
patients with chronic discoid LE (CDLE) and eight patients with subacu
te cutaneous LE (SCLE). Using a panel of monoclonal antibodies the fol
lowing results were obtained: (i) ICAM-1 was expressed on epidermal ke
ratinocytes, dermal inflammatory cells, and endothelial cells in most
biopsies, whereas LFA-1 was confined to the dermis. Attachments betwee
n keratinocytes or endothelial cells and activated T lymphocytes via I
CAM-1/LFA-1 may be a possible mechanism of target/effector recognition
in cutaneous LE. (ii) HLA-DR was expressed on epidermal keratinocytes
and cells of the dermal infiltrate, but not on endothelial cells. HLA
-DR(+) cells probably function as antigen-presenting cells, leading to
major histocompatibility complex-restricted cellular cytotoxicity in
cutaneous LE. (iii) Interleukin 2 receptor expression on dermal inflam
matory cells was weak, indicating non-specific activation of T lymphoc
ytes. (iv) The dermal inflammatory cells were T lymphocytes, mainly of
the helper/inducer subtype. B lymphocytes were rarely found in the de
rmis. In general, no significant immunohistochemical differences were
found between CDLE and SCLE, suggesting that these variants represent
clinical subtypes rather than different pathogenetic entities.