D. Feidieker et al., MICROBIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL EVALUATION OF A SITE CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORINATED AROMATIC-COMPOUNDS AND HEXACHLOROCYCLOHEXANES, FEMS microbiology, ecology, 15(3-4), 1994, pp. 265-278
Several soil and subsoil samples from a soil accumulation and from the
aquifer of a site of a former pesticide production factory, which wer
e contaminated with chlorinated benzenes (CB), chlorinated phenols (CP
) and hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCH) were investigated chemically for th
eir content of individual pollutants, and microbiologically for the pr
esence and the activity of different microorganisms. The samples of th
e soil accumulation (until 2 m depth) showed a higher content of chlor
inated organic compounds (> 1000 mg extractable halogenated organic su
bstances (EOX) kg(-1) soil; ratio CB:HCH:CP = 88:10:2), than the sampl
es from the aquifer (< 150 mg EOX kg-l soil; ratio CB:HCH:CP = 88:6:6)
. All isomers of CB and CP, and the five important isomers of HCH coul
d be detected in the samples. In samples of the accumulation, 1,2,3,4-
tetrachlorobenzene and pentachlorobenzene were the dominant CB in the
upper layers, and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene in the lower layers. In almos
t all samples alpha-HCH was predominant (> 50%) among the HCH. The maj
or pollutant of samples from the aquifer was 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (>
50% of CB). Among the HCH, delta-HCH was predominant, with only three
exceptions. Degradation experiments with mixed bacterial cultures sho
wed the aerobic degradation of monochlorobenzene, 1,3- and 1,4-dichlor
obenzene 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, 1,2,3,4- and 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenze
ne, 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene only in combination with 1,2,4-trichloroben
zene, and alpha-HCH, whereas 1,2-dichlorobenzene, 1,3,5-trichlorobenze
ne, beta-HCH, 4-chlorophenol, and 2,4,5-trichloropheno1 were not signi
ficantly transformed. It should be stressed that the compounds which w
ere biodegraded in the laboratory were present in relatively high conc
entrations in situ, indicating limiting factors in their in situ degra
dation. Soil and subsoil microorganisms were present in numbers up to
10(5) colony forming units (CFU) g(-1) soil. In soil samples, Gram-pos
itive bacteria (coryneforms and Bacillus spp.) were dominant, mainly i
n the upper layers, but in the subsoil samples of the aquifer the majo
rity of isolates were Gram-negative and could be identified as Pseudom
onas stutzeri, Ps. fluorescens, Aeromonas sp. and Acinetobacter sp. Th
e degradation potential observed under laboratory conditions should be
studied further under in situ conditions to assess the success of a b
ioremediation.