B. Suc et al., CHOLEDOCHOTOMY, INTRAOPERATIVE ENDOSCOPY AND EXTERNAL BILIARY DRAINAGE IN THE TREATMENT OF THE COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES - A 15-YEAR EXPERIENCE, Annales de chirurgie, 48(10), 1994, pp. 905-910
The treatment of common bile duct stones is controversial. The objecti
ve of our study was to report the results of choledochotomy, rigid cho
ledochoscopy and systematic external biliary drainage in the treatment
of stones of the common bile duel. Over a 15-year period, 555 patient
s were operated in our department according to a precise surgical prot
ocol. 14% of these patients were operated as an emergency and 11.8% we
re operated immediately after endoscopic sphincterotomy. One third of
patients suffered from cholangitis. The endoscopic investigation of th
e common bile duct was positive in 81.5% of patients. The investigatio
n was negative in 18.5% and negative choledochotomy was significantly
more frequent in patients operated for acute pancreatitis (p < 0.05).
External biliary drainage was performed in 95.7% of patients. When nec
essary, a bilioenteric anastomosis (3%) or a surgical sphincterotomy (
1.9%) was also performed. The postoperative mortality rate was 4.8% si
gnificantly higher in patients over the age of 70, in patients operate
d as an emergency and in patients operated immediately after endoscopi
c sphincterotomy (p < 0.05). The morbidity rate was 8.4%. Residual sto
nes were diagnosed in 4.4% of the patients. The presence of residual s
tones was significantly more frequent in patients with multiple stones
of the common bile duct (p < 0.05). Long-term follow-up was available
for 89% of patients, 95% of whom were asymptomatic. These results, ba
sed on a homogeneous therapeutic protocol, can be used as a reference
for the evaluation of other techniques, especially endoscopic and lapa
roscopic techniques.