QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF THE LEVEL OF EXPOSURE TO GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODE INFECTION IN FIRST-YEAR CALVES

Citation
Hw. Ploeger et al., QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF THE LEVEL OF EXPOSURE TO GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODE INFECTION IN FIRST-YEAR CALVES, Veterinary parasitology, 55(4), 1994, pp. 287-315
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Parasitiology,"Veterinary Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
03044017
Volume
55
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
287 - 315
Database
ISI
SICI code
0304-4017(1994)55:4<287:QEOTLO>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
In two experiments groups of calves were exposed to different levels a nd patterns of infection with Ostertagia spp. and Cooperia spp. The ex perimental design simulated the stereotypic pattern of herbage infesta tion, including a normal or a delayed midsummer increase, under condit ions of set-stocking. The purpose of the experiments was to investigat e the accuracy of egg counts, pepsinogen and gastrin values and antibo dy titres as estimators of the level of exposure to infection. Faecal egg counts significantly reflected levels of exposure during the first half of the simulated grazing season. Antibody titres and pepsinogen values reflected levels of exposure best during August and September, partly depending on the pattern and range of levels of exposure. Antib ody titres against Cooperia spp. were particularly useful when levels of exposure to gastrointestinal nematode infection were low. Gastrin v alues were elevated only at high levels of exposure, which caused larg e weight gain reductions, in the later part of the simulated first gra zing season. It is suggested that antibody titres and pepsinogen value s can be used for prognostic diagnosis, indicating whether or not cont rol measures should be taken. Both estimators of infection correlated significantly with the realised weight gain at the end of the simulate d grazing season, Egg counts in the second month after the initial inf ection (turnout) also may be of significant value to support decisions concerning control measures. Comparisons with data from field trials and experiments conducted by others under various conditions suggested that the conclusions of the present experiments are also valid under field conditions. Furthermore, the results supported the conclusions d rawn from previous field work, that levels of exposure are often very low on commercial farms in the Netherlands.