Ir. Inglis et Ds. Shepherd, RATS WORK FOR FOOD THEY THEN REJECT - SUPPORT FOR THE INFORMATION-PRIMACY APPROACH TO LEARNED INDUSTRIOUSNESS, Ethology, 98(2), 1994, pp. 154-164
There is good evidence that in many situations, animals prefer to work
for food even when identical food is freely available. This phenomeno
n is called 'learned industriousness' or 'contra-freeloading' and has
been found in several species. This study shows that wild rats will al
so work hard for contaminated food that they associate with sickness a
nd subsequently reject, even when wholesome food is continuously avail
able at no extra cost. Seven wild rats (Rattus novegicus) lived for 4
wk in cages containing two operant levers and associated pellet dispen
sers. The rats earned all their food by lever pressing for 45-mg food
pellets on a variable-interval 10s (VI10s) schedule in each dispenser.
After 1 wk, pellets containing a sub-lethal dose of an acute rodentic
ide were available for 12 h (the test period) from the preferred dispe
nser, before being replaced by normal food pellets. This procedure was
repeated 1 wk and 4 wk later. The number of lever presses, pellets de
livered, and pellets consumed at each dispenser were recorded for 12 h
prior to the test `period, during the 12-h test period, and 12 h afte
r the test period. The rats quickly learned to shift their feeding pre
ference during the test period away from the dispenser that provided t
he rodenticide pellets. However, during the second half of the rest pe
riod, lever pressing at this dispenser increased, even though the pell
ets thereby obtained were still rejected. This divergence between the
lever pressing rate and the pellet consumption rate increased over the
three trials. This 'learned-industriousness' behaviour is nor, easily
explained by the self-reinforcing hypothesis, by the obligate species
-specific response hypothesis, or as some artefact of the operant situ
ation. It is suggested that the lever pressing towards the end of the
trial, for pellets that, were rejected, enabled the animals to gather
information about a rare, but very important, event, namely, the prese
nce of dangerous food at a previously preferred and normally safe feed
ing site. The data lend support to the information-primacy theory of l
earned industriousness.