Ge. Good et al., MALE GENDER-ROLE CONFLICT - PSYCHOMETRIC ISSUES AND RELATIONS TO PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS, Journal of counseling psychology, 42(1), 1995, pp. 3-10
Two distinct deficits in research On male gender role conflict are add
ressed: (a) lack of psychometric information and (b) lack of research
involving clinical samples. First, using 1,043 men across three sample
s, the psychometric properties of the Gender Role Conflict Scale (GRCS
) were examined through confirmatory factor analyses, internal consist
ency estimation, and construct validation. Next, using 130 male univer
sity counseling center clients across two samples, the relation betwee
n gender role conflict and psychological distress was examined. The GR
CS demonstrated good internal consistency and was best modeled as 4 in
tercorrelated factors, as originally proposed by J. M. O'Neil, B. Helm
s, R. Gable, L. David, and 1,. Wrightsman (1986). Construct validity w
as supported through correlations with attitudes about masculinity, fe
ar of intimacy, and social desirability in expected directions. Howeve
r reservations about the Conflicts Between Work and Family Relations s
ubscale are noted. Male gender role conflict was significantly related
to psychological distress, with the Restrictive Emotionality subscale
being the best predictor of distress level. implications for mental h
ealth practice and future research are discussed.