ON GENDER-ROLE CONFLICT IN MEN - FUTURE-DIRECTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNSELING - COMMENT ON GOOD ET-AL (1995) AND COURNOYER AND MAHALIK(1995)

Authors
Citation
Pp. Heppner, ON GENDER-ROLE CONFLICT IN MEN - FUTURE-DIRECTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNSELING - COMMENT ON GOOD ET-AL (1995) AND COURNOYER AND MAHALIK(1995), Journal of counseling psychology, 42(1), 1995, pp. 20-23
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Applied","Psychology, Educational
ISSN journal
00220167
Volume
42
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
20 - 23
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0167(1995)42:1<20:OGCIM->2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Fifteen years of research on gender role conflict indicate it has been a fruitful construct in counseling psychology. G.E. Good, J. M. Rober tson, J.M. O'Neil, L. F. Fitzgerald, M. Stevens, K. A. Debord, K. M. B artels, and D. B. Braverman (1995) and R. J. Cournoyer and J. R. Mahal ik (1995) add to the empirical knowledge and are certain to stimulate thinking in this area. In this comment, issues related to (a) psycholo gical maladjustment, (b) test development, (c) life span development, and (d) practice implications are discussed. Although clear progress i s being made, much more is unknown about how gender-related variables positively and negatively affect male development and, subsequently, t he practice of counseling psychology.