USEFULNESS OF A PROTOTYPE INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND IMAGING IN EVALUATION OF AORTIC DISSECTION AND COMPARISON WITH ANGIOGRAPHIC STUDY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
Citation
E. Yamada et al., USEFULNESS OF A PROTOTYPE INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND IMAGING IN EVALUATION OF AORTIC DISSECTION AND COMPARISON WITH ANGIOGRAPHIC STUDY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING, The American journal of cardiology, 75(2), 1995, pp. 161-165
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
SICI code
0002-9149(1995)75:2<161:UOAPIU>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of information obta
ined with a prototype intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) system in chroni
c aortic dissection by comparing results with angiography, transesopha
geal echocardiography (TEE), computed tomography, or magnetic resonanc
e imaging. We assigned 15 patients to IVUS imaging after they underwen
t angiography. The detection rate of the intimal flap was 100% in all
segments of the aorta, and the detection rate of the intimal tear was
0%, 50%, 50%, and 77.8% in the ascending, arch, descending, and abdomi
nal aorta, respectively. IVUS demonstrated 100% of the celiac and rena
l arteries, and 80% of the superior mesenteric arteries as well as the
ir relation to dissection. It clarified the origin of 12 of 60 main ab
dominal branches (20%) which were not clear on the angiogram. It also
determined the distal extent of the dissection in all cases. With rega
rd to the size of the vessel, there was a good correlation between IVU
S and computed tomographic values (r = 0.98, p < 0.01). No complicatio
ns occurred in any patient. IVUS accurately demonstrated thrombus or s
pontaneous echo contrast in the false lumen that was confirmed with co
mputed tomography or TEE, or both. It was especially useful in evaluat
ing the abdominal aorta with regard to determining the size of the ves
sel, the extent of dissection, the relation of the branches to the fal
se lumen, and the detection of intimal tears-important information for
follow-up of patients and for planning surgery. IVUS proved to be an
accurate, useful, and safe method for confirming, clarifying, or even
adding new information to the other diagnostic tools in the evaluation
of aortic dissection.