STANDARD AND NEAR-SURFACE LASER-DOPPLER PERFUSION IN FOOT DORSUM SKINOF DIABETIC AND NONDIABETIC SUBJECTS WITH AND WITHOUT COEXISTING PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL-DISEASE
Hn. Mayrovitz et Pb. Larsen, STANDARD AND NEAR-SURFACE LASER-DOPPLER PERFUSION IN FOOT DORSUM SKINOF DIABETIC AND NONDIABETIC SUBJECTS WITH AND WITHOUT COEXISTING PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL-DISEASE, Microvascular research, 48(3), 1994, pp. 338-348
Appropriate assessment of microvascular function is now recognized as
an important adjunct to the diagnostic workup and medical follow-up fo
r a variety of conditions. Laser Doppler fluxmetry (LDF)-derived rbc p
erfusion (Q) and the volume (V) and velocity (U) components are useful
in this regard but the fact that the sampled volume includes both nut
ritional and nonnutritional components may limit its specificity and r
ange of usefulness. It was reasoned that if the depth of penetration c
ould be reduced without significantly altering essential optical trans
mission features, then the detected signal would better represent the
nutritional component. A 0.68-mm-thick Delrin spacer was fabricated an
d used to compare LDF values with (WITH) and without (WITHOUT) its use
on the foot dorsum of 71 limbs of 44 diabetic (DM) and nondiabetic (N
O-DM) subjects with lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD, n = 39) an
d without disease (NORM, n = 32). Overall LDF values WITH as compared
to WITHOUT had a slightly greater LI (1.01 vs 0,89 mm/sec, P < 0.01) a
nd much lower V(0.06 vs 0.63%, P < 0.001) and Q (0.25 vs 1.88 ml/min/1
00 g, P < 0.001). In NO-DM subjects, WITH detected a lower Q in limbs
with LEAD (0.14 vs 0.27, P < 0.05) but WITHOUT did not (1.48 vs 1.47,
ns). In DM subjects, WITH measured a significantly lower U in LEAD lim
bs (1.05 vs 1.22 mm/sec, P < 0.05), which was not detected WITHOUT. Wi
thout the spacer, NORM limb LDF values were all greater in DM vs NO-DM
subjects. With spacer use, only the DM velocity component was signifi
cantly greater. Use of a modified LDF procedure has shown both utility
and promise as a method for evaluation of skin microcirculation and a
ppears to offer some potential benefits as compared with the currently
used standard method. Previously undocumented differences between LEA
D and NORM limbs in DM and NO-DM patients as herein reported represent
initial findings using a 0.68-mm spacer. (C) 1994 Academic Press, Inc
.