COMPARISON OF ESTIMATES OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY IN PREMENOPAUSAL AND POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN USING THE INSULIN TOLERANCE-TEST AND THE FREQUENTLY SAMPLED INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TEST
Sr. Lindheim et al., COMPARISON OF ESTIMATES OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY IN PREMENOPAUSAL AND POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN USING THE INSULIN TOLERANCE-TEST AND THE FREQUENTLY SAMPLED INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TEST, Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, 1(2), 1994, pp. 150-154
OBJECTIVE: We assessed insulin sensitivity in women comparing the insu
lin tolerance test (ITT) with the intravenous glucose tolerance test w
ith frequent sampling and computer modeling (FSIVGTT) and evaluated th
e effects of hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women using both metho
ds. METHODS: This prospective study tested 18 premenopausal women and
ten postmenopausal women randomized to receive either estrogen alone o
r estrogen with a sequential progestin for 6 months at a menopause res
earch clinic. All subjects received an ITT and an FSIVGTT within 48-72
hours of each other in random sequence. Postmenopausal women were the
n randomized to receive either 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogen for
6 months or 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogen with medroxyprogester
one acetate, 10 mg, for 10 days each month for 6 months. Both the ITT
and the FSIVGTT were repeated following hormonal therapy at 2 and 6 mo
nths. Plasma insulin and glucose were measured; insulin sensitivity wa
s calculated after the ITT (Kitt) and the FSIVGTT (Si) at each visit i
n each group. RESULTS: A close correlation was found between Kitt and
Si values at initial testing in both pre- and postmenopausal women and
following both types of hormonal therapy (r = 0.76 for all tests, P <
.001). A reduction in insulin sensitivity was observed in postmenopau
sal compared to premenopausal women; this occurred in five of ten post
menopausal women using the Kitt measurement and in four of ten women u
sing Si. Estrogen replacement had a beneficial effect on insulin sensi
tivity. While Kitt increases by 24.2+/-9.6% (P < .05), the increase in
Si (6.7+/-18%) was not significant because of the variability with th
is measurement. An attenuation in insulin sensitivity was seen with ad
ded progestin. Kitt values decreased by 17.7+/-7.7% and Si values by 3
1.9+/-12%. Similar findings were noted at 2 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS:
The ITT and FSIVGTT provide quantitatively similar information regard
ing insulin sensitivity in healthy women. A mild degree of insulin res
istance appears to be present in some healthy postmenopausal women. Es
trogen appears to improve insulin sensitivity, while added progestin m
ay attenuate this beneficial effect.