The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) has emerged as a stand
ard in the study of depression. However, despite its extensive use and
the assumption that it is a single measure, integration of data produ
ced in studies utilizing the HRSD is difficult for several reasons. Af
ter a review of 688 relevant articles, it was determined that approxim
ately 42% contained referencing errors resulting in confusion over whi
ch administration procedures were actually implemented. Since its intr
oduction, several alternate versions of the scale have emerged and alt
ernate scoring methods, ad hoc revisions, or derivative versions of th
e scale have been applied. These and related problems with the HRSD ar
e detailed along with suggestions for reducing the ambiguities that re
sult from its continued use in depression research.