This paper studies private protection against crime. It examines the f
act that when individuals decide to privately protect their properties
, two opposite effects take place. On one hand, the probability of app
rehending a criminal attempting to steal a property is increased; this
should discourage potential criminals. On the other hand, the signal
is sent that something valuable had to be protected; this may attract
criminals. This paper's contribution is to take into account the fact
that private protection conveys information to the criminals. The poss
ibility for the individuals to parade as protected is also considered.
Whether private protection carries information depends on whether the
mimicking device is free or costly. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.