J. Beca et al., SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS FOR PREDICTION OF OUTCOME IN ACUTE SEVERE BRAIN INJURY, The Journal of pediatrics, 126(1), 1995, pp. 44-49
The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively short-latency
somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) as a predictor of outcome in ac
ute, severe brain injury, and to compare this with the predictive powe
r of the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale score and computed
tomographic scan. Outcome was measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale
at a minimum of 6 months after injury. We studied 109 patients (aged 0
.1 to 16.8 years) with SEPs within 4 days of the onset of coma. Four p
atients had absent SEPs and a favorable outcome by the Glasgow Outcome
Scale (full recovery or moderate disability); two of these patients h
ad meningitis with bilateral subdural effusions, one had a mid-brain h
emorrhage, and one had a decompressive craniectomy for uncontrolled in
tracranial hypertension. Normal SEPs had a positive predictive value f
or favorable outcome of 93% (95% confidence interval (Cl), 77% to 99%)
, and absent SEPs had a positive predictive value for unfavorable outc
ome by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (severe disability, survival in a per
sistent vegetative state, or death) of 92% (95% Cl, 80% to 98%). If th
e above identifiable clinical situations in which a physical barrier e
xisted to impede cutaneous reception of the electrical impulse were ex
cluded, the positive predictive value of absent SEPs for poor outcome
reached 100% (95% Cl, 92% to 100%). An absent motor response to painfu
l stimulus also had 100% positive predictive value (95% Cl, 84% to 100
%) for unfavorable outcome; however, 23% of patients could not be eval
uated because of the effects of muscle relaxants or sedatives. In pati
ents with traumatic brain injury, results of computed tomography did n
ot reliably predict outcome. Of the 59 patients with unfavorable outco
me, 76% could be identified with SEPs compared with 36% with examinati
on of motor function. We suggest that SEPs be performed in children wi
th acute severe brain injury because they add an important tool to the
physician's prognostic armamentarium. We conclude that in the absence
of the above mentioned identifiable clinical situations, absent SEPs
predict 100% unfavorable outcome, and this finding may warrant conside
ration of withdrawal of treatment in children with brain injuries.