This paper explores the use of empirical evidence to determine whether
the exposure of minorities to environmental risks constitutes aversiv
e racism. Connections are drawn between definitions of aversive racism
and statistical approaches to research into the relationship between
race and risk, paying particular attention to the influence of both no
n-racial discrimination and industrial location factors. Federal judic
ial and executive remedies to aversive racism are examined in light of
the standards of evidence presented. An empirical study of the connec
tion between race and exposure to toxic releases is then presented for
Census block groups in Georgia and Ohio. It was found that the signif
icance of race depends on the breadth of the explanatory model used in
the analysis. A model of overall exposure to toxic releases shows tha
t race is significant in a narrow model of discrimination but not ina
broader model including industrial location factors. However, a model
of targeting of minorities in the recent location of toxics-emitting f
acilities fails to show discrimination in any of the regression analys
es. These findings support the view that environmental justice concern
s cannot be addressed through reform of siting processes; broader reme
dies involving more stringent protection of exposure to toxic emission
s are more likely to be effective.